Existence

as 'condition of being'

Morphological Analysis

• Etymon: Existence from Latin exsistō: 'to be'
• Morpheme breakdown: Prefix ex- 'out' + ist: a clipping of sistere: 'set' + suffix‎ -ence 'condition of' → 'condition of setting out'
• Functional cognate: existence: as the 'condition of being' where being: the 'action to be' is functionally equivalent to the process of 'setting out'.

Essential definition

The word existence as the 'condition of being' is by literal extension a 'process of declaring together of action to be'. We might declare this process of declaring together, in functional terms, as a conference of difference, a 'condition of bearing together' transforming the 'condition of bearing apart'.

Semantic context

• Conventional sense: The state of being, existing, or occurring; beinghood. (Note: Semantic drift from essential meaning)
• Essential meaning (my usage): condition of being

Philosophical significance

This definition of existence as a 'conference of difference' is philosophically significant because it replaces the search for fundamental things with a single, active process of relational declaration. This process is the ultimate reality, rendering all other concepts—from physical laws to consciousness itself—as secondary patterns that emerge from it. It solves ancient problems by stating that to exist is simply to participate in this foundational, co-creative act.

Usage in this lexicon

When I use the word existence in my work, I mean exactly 'condition of being' and by literal extension: 'the process of declaring together of action to be' – in functional terms: the 'conference of difference'. This definition:

• ensures terminological fidelity by adhering strictly to the morphological roots of 'existence' and eliminating interpretive drift;
• eliminates abstraction by replacing vague metaphysical speculation with a concrete and process-based definition rooted in observable acts like declaring and acting;
• maintains an operational focus by providing a directly actionable concept where as a 'conference of difference' existence can be studied and influenced and participated in consciously;
• unifies theory and practice by bridging philosophy and practical disciplines like communication theory and social sciences and systems theory through defining reality's core as a communicative and relational act;
• dissolves hard problems by rendering classic philosophical problems such as mind-body and static being versus becoming moot through positing a primary process that is already active and unified;
• clarifies agency by explicitly framing being as an 'action' which places agency and performance at the very center of what it means to exist;
• establishes foundations for ethics by making interdependence or 'declaring together' the fundamental condition of reality which makes ethics a prerequisite of coherent existence and not an addition;
• demystifies consciousness by aligning conscious experience with the 'declaring together' process and suggesting it is not an emergent epiphenomenon but a primary aspect of the existential process itself;
• provides an empirically groundable concept by pointing toward potential physical correlates such as information exchange and force carrier interactions as instances of the 'conference of difference';
• resolves the paradox of the One and the Many by explicitly describing how singular existence as 'together' is constituted by diverse actions as 'declaring' which solves an ancient philosophical puzzle;
• asserts foundational relationality by positing relation and not substance as the primary ontological fact and stating that existence is relational;
• makes intrinsic interdependence explicit by clarifying that to 'be' is to be in a constitutive declarative conference of difference;
• identifies the first principle by establishing the 'conference of difference' itself as the fundamental and irreducible process primitive in which all existence adapts and evolves and transforms;
• eliminates infinite regress by providing a terminal foundation where there is no 'thing' behind the process because the process is the foundational condition;
• unifies ontology and epistemology through the process that transforms existence as the 'conference of difference' being the same process used to know it which means the process is realization in both senses of the word as in knowing and transforming;
• grounds all derivation by establishing that every law or entity or state can be theoretically derived as a specific pattern or outcome within this primary relational process;
• transcends all physical theories by clarifying that the 'conference of difference' is not a model or property of physics but is the constitutive pattern of existence itself of which all physical theories whether classical or quantum are merely specific and contingent descriptions and that the models are expressions of the process and not explanations for it;
• clarifies the nature of laws by stating that physical and logical laws are not prior impositions but are the emergent and stable agreements of the ongoing conference of difference;
• dissolves the subject-object split by affirming there is no subject or object but only the singular and relational conference of difference which is the process of declaring together and that what we label as subject or object are merely temporary and co-defined positions within this unified field of relation;
• provides the criterion for reality by establishing that the conference of difference and the process of declaring together is the real and there is no more fundamental reality and that what we perceive as the past or the future are constructs generated and sustained within the conference of difference we perceive as now.

Related terms

• Being

Sources

• Wiktionary

*This definition follows morphological essentialism principles. See the Methodology for details.