Towards a Mathematical Proof of God

by John Mackay 550 words

Wikipedia states::

A mathematical proof is a deductive argument for a mathematical statement, showing that the stated assumptions logically guarantee the conclusion. (Wikipedia. 2025)

Following the mathematical statement below is an argument that supports it, not only as the equation of existence but as a mathematical proof of God as Creator. This equation of existence reads:

∃ = {Δ}

It has been said that all logic proceeds from an assumption and in this case that assumption is the principle that:

All existence is a conference of difference, a ‘condition of bearing together’ transforming the ‘condition of bearing apart’. (Mackay. J.I. 2024)

Within this statement sits the totality of existence be it past, present or future. Think about it, there is no singularity of existence—everything is a conference of difference.

I explain the equation in my book the Gospel of Being:

[T]he symbol ∃ represents existence, the set notation { } serves as conference and the Delta symbol Δ serves as difference. Hence the expression {Δ} i.e. ‘conference of difference’ is the constant expression that initiates the equation of existence ∃ = {Δ}. (Mackay. J.I. 2024)

The point is that there isn't anything in physics that exists without the conference of difference {Δ} which is what cements it as the constant expression of existence. In short, the constant expression, {Δ} the conference of difference functions specifically to express: ‘press out’ existence.

Importantly, the conference of difference is not a theory of everything—it is everything. (Mackay. J.I. 2024)

This constant expression is thus Principal: ‘unvaryingly foremost’ to existence and thus not of existence itself. In this sense the constant expression is backformed from observation and deduction of everything that has been observed to exist. Thus the constant expression functions to initiate existence but does not exist in and of itself. From a purely semantic perspective, the constant expression {Δ} the conference of difference is Principal to existence, not of it. Thus the limit to proof of God as Creator of existence can only be deducted not observed. Instead the {Δ} can only be backformed from observation of the ‘condition of being’ that is existence. The character Firmus in Plutarch's essay The Symposiacs calls attention to this as follows:

It is universally true that a principle is before that whose principle it is... (Plutarch, 46-120 A.D.)

In summary, because all existence is a conference of difference {Δ}, it ‘stands together’ as the constant expression: ‘process of pressing out’ of existence hence fulfilling the role of Creator of existence, which by any other name is the construct that is God.

Thanks for Reading

If you liked this article, then you'll love the book it's based on. Take a deeper dive into ontology today.

Check it Out!