Towards a mathematical proof of God

God as cause to creation through the lens of do-calculus.

What if God is not a belief but the provable expression of existence?

For millennia, the question “Why does anything exist at all?” has haunted the minds of philosophers, theologians, and scientists alike. We’ve named gods, defined first causes, and modeled the cosmos. But no one — until now — has dared to treat existence itself as a solvable equation.

This Book Does What No Other Has

Towards a Mathematical Proof of God is not a theological treatise. It is not religious. It is not speculative. It is ontological proof, grounded in causal reasoning. Using Judea Pearl’s do-calculus, this work proves the probability of existence where the conference of difference CΔ is present or absent — formally declaring:

P(∃ | do(CΔ = 1)) > 0 \ or\ P(∃ | do(CΔ = 0)) =0

What You’ll Discover

• a rigorous journey from Aristotle to modern causal logic;
• how the conference of difference is causally necessary for being;
• a reframing of God as the causal process of existence; and
• why this model is formally testable and universally applicable.

Why This Book Matters?

Where thinkers like Descartes and Spinoza explored the idea of God’s existence and models like Autaxys map the patterns of existence — the what — this author offers a comprehensive framework that accounts not only for what exists, but how and why it must.

This is not an argument about God. It is a demonstration of what God must be — if existence is real at all. This is a once-in-a-century work of metaphysical clarity and causal rigor. The most original ontological proposition since Spinoza — and this time, it’s formally testable.